Just wanted to share with you all, for me, this little experience who have served more than 20 years in organizational management issues and spiritual development involving government and private organizations. Often the problems shared with me is a problem between the top management, administration, management and support staff is as follows:
Management systems are often changed
Management system should be mastered by every employee to obtain an efficient and productive management. If management system for the organization often change, employees will experience job stress due to not understanding the concept and jurisdictions work accurately and clearly. Certainly the work will be done in a state of panic and do not know to whom to refer.
This often occurs because of failure or we fail to plan and implement a change that without thinking just because according to the instructions of their superiors. All moral rejected aside, for the sake of flutter or "yes boss" or "betulah boss". Does not apply to corporate governance.
Communication 'break down'
This is among the highest ranking problems that often occur in the organization. There are several reasons this problem occurs. Among the top too 'bossy' with their staff. They ignore the problems that occur at lower levels, not 'briefing assignments' well, and many give directions. The largest percentage is the boss just give orders to subordinates. Imagine how ineffective communication management in the organization? You certainly can imagine.
Try it out of the comfortable rooms and down to the operational level to investigate complaints and expressions of the staff. Sometimes the complaints it is a proposal that may be applicable. Only those who are involved in a field that knows the real issue.
Working position and qualifications significantly different
Among the complaints most often asked of me many staff who can not master their field of work very well. Imagine the potential in the field of IT but placed in financial management. How do you want to carry out your work? I'm not saying it is impossible to do. Only if there is no clear explanation of the scope of work will inevitably put pressure on the staff.
As another example, kakaitangan capacity was only able to carry out the work as a clerk but is responsible for implementing the work of an executive. For individuals who do not understand about the post Responsibility accepted as a sign of pretentious but its output remains the same as that given by a clerk. When kakitangfan failed to execute his duties as an executive, so easy menyalahkannya.Kita we actually have menganayaikan individual.
Less exposure and courses
Work is a way of claiming your output. But if many years of output required of an employee while he received less input, how the situation works? You will definitely stressful, less skilled and also lost the motivation to do the job every day. Many have complained to me. There are organizations that can not arrange training for their staff very well that some people work 10 years have not been attending training and job skills development, self-motivation.
Management on a "little Napoleon"
In other concept is the "little Napoleon" is "power hungry", where some indivisu hold its own by-laws in carrying out its duties and suppress the other employees or subordinates. Situation "shock myself" this must be subverted and specify only official orders only enforceable.
Or if you want to issue directives or reprimands make a "formal" writing that the decision or direction can be referred by the official to the higher or responsible.
Management by intimidation or fear (management by fear)
Staff frightened by threats or warnings oppressive and untrustworthy. It will also lead to dissatisfaction and consequently affect the productivity of the company.
No comments:
Post a Comment